Political Crossfire Forums

no methods available today can fix this issue, but if methods become available in the future i do not think it would be wrong to use them for this or the other way, a la The Forever War (although that was used for population control and seems a bit f**k)

edt: fcuked is nothing like woopie. why must it be this way

The idea that a certain sexual orientation needs to be "cured" is as absurd as the idea that legislation needs to be passed that prevents parents from attempting to "treat" it.

The thing that bothers me is not so much parents trying to cure their child of their sexuality, but the fact there are people can who claim they can do it and tout for business.

It would be better to pass a law that only practitioners approved by the American Psychiatric Association may treat minors for personality disorders or mental health problems.

Definitely a dumb law, and potentially unconstitutional IMO.

It's very clumsy. Isn't it possible to pass a law that restricts children to being treated by members of the American Psychiatric Association?

(looks at watch) 9th Circuit overturns it in 5...4...3...

Obvious intrusion into the parental domain. Should be overturned, if signed.

are parents allowed to emotionally and psychologically destroy their children?

if so, why is that a protected right?