by Spider » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:13 pm
I guess I'm just not seeing a meaningful difference between social capital or monetary capital. If they can both be exchanged for goods and services, then they are both capital just the same. I get the motivation behind this, but there still needs to be a tangible basis for the social currency, if its to have any real value.
So, where money has a basis in its value based on faith in whoever issues it, or on bars of gold or whatever, this money would have a basis on...what exactly? Who would control how much is issues? How would inflation be addressed? Its an interesting idea.
But if this is a mode of exchange for things of actual value, it needs to have a solid basis in actual value, as opposed to perceived social value....which is frankly nothing more than a value judgment.