Why free speech should be absolute
46 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by eynon81 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:20 am
I'm pretty happy with the current US system. I don't agree that Corporations are individuals entitled to the same speech rights though. Scalia is just kinda making that up.
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by wormwood » Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:22 pm
For among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised
-Nicolo Machiavelli
-Nicolo Machiavelli
-
wormwood - Congressman
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:02 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by pricklysponge » Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:50 pm
- These users thanked the author pricklysponge for the post:
- The Dharma Bum
-
pricklysponge - Council Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:29 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Political Leaning: Communist
-
pricklysponge - Council Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:29 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Political Leaning: Communist
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by eynon81 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:14 pm
Last edited by eynon81 on Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by JDHURF » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:16 pm
That's the road to Bolshevism and single-party dictatorship. That's not communism, that is fascism itself.
The problem isn't freedom of expression, the problem is that monopoly capitalism equates capital with speech. The Citizens United Supreme Court ruling wasn't really about freedom of speech, it was about allowing for the unrestrained influence of capital in the political process, pretty much the opposite of free speech. Free speech is now not free, it is incredibly expensive. To launch an effective advertising campaign now costs millions and billions of dollars. That's not free speech. That's the aristocracy of capital.
The problem isn't freedom of expression, the problem is that monopoly capitalism equates capital with speech. The Citizens United Supreme Court ruling wasn't really about freedom of speech, it was about allowing for the unrestrained influence of capital in the political process, pretty much the opposite of free speech. Free speech is now not free, it is incredibly expensive. To launch an effective advertising campaign now costs millions and billions of dollars. That's not free speech. That's the aristocracy of capital.
- These users thanked the author JDHURF for the post:
- The Dharma Bum
-
JDHURF - Governor
- Posts: 2628
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:53 am
- Location: Desolation Row
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian Socialist
Re: Why free speech should be absolute
by pricklysponge » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:36 pm
Last edited by pricklysponge on Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
pricklysponge - Council Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:29 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
- Political Leaning: Communist
46 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests