calling you out, galt

[John Galt]

i thought it was a factor of how many points their leader has in mil adm or dip, at least, that's what it seemed like last time i looked at it. that is, if heavy adn likely to be a bureaucratic attitude, etc

[The Comrade]

that might also affect it, i don't know.

[John Galt]

[The Comrade]

it pigeonholes certain countries to certain roles, and that is very boring.

[John Galt]

[The Comrade]

because i want to play a game not europa universalis: the history simulator.

[John Galt]

well all the nations start off as completely unbalanced anyway. the game is called europe everywhere. jsut because i want the great nation of MALI to take over the world doesn't mean it's gonna happen. if anything the only thing to complain about is "lucky nations". the thing i hate about that is not jsut the generals, the leaders and all the other shit they get... but they manpower regen. it's insane.

still the game is fun, up to about 1650, then it starts to not be as fun. i think the OE mechanic needs some work. AE isn't too bad, once you understand how it works. I dothink it should be at like 50 or something before coaltions form though, not 30 (i think it's 30) and it needs to be nerfed for HRE nations taking over HRE territory (fine for non HRE though to be high)

[John Galt]

actually there's a modifier as low as 20AE that starts coalitions (outraged opinion). that's too low. once it gets to 40AE it doubles. at 50AE it is 4x the amount at 20AE.