by JDHURF » Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:49 pm
The butthurt in this thread is incredible. If bigstick61 is man enough to shoot someone he is for damn sure man enough to support his assertions with evidence when he takes it upon himself to run his mouth about it without catching feelings when someone doesn't take his anonymous forum account's word at face value. If not, like I said, he probably shouldn't bring it up.
The guy is skipping from thread to thread making retarded claims without evidence and then slinking away when asked to support them. He says W's policies were "a special form of progressivism," is asked to clarify and is never heard from again. He wants to allege that he was involved in a "defensive shooting" that went to trial (many clear cut defensive shootings never go to trial), lost him his commission and drained all of his finances. That's fine. But, only a sycophant or a complete idiot would take the claims of an anonymous poster who travels around gun forums at face value.