Congressional Republicans' Most-Current Tantrum!!

[Libertarian602]

Indy, your chasing your tail. I've already pointed out that people are loosing thier jobs, and yet in your intellectually dishonest fashion, you completely avoided to address this point.

I pointed out that 76 coal plants have been shut down since 2005. Can you even bring yourself to admit that working Americans make wages from the coal industry?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/bus ... s/9859913/

Now here where simple math helps out. If we have have cut emissions by 17%, and our goal is a cut of 28%, what the f**k do you think is going to happen?

Next, I pointed out by curbing use of a cheap and available energy sourse, there's going to be a two fold affect. One, China will gain a upper hand economically, because they can use coal longer while American curbs its use. Coal is cheap energy, China wins. Secondly I pointed out wage trends for the last thirty years, and stagnation trends that are here to stay for the forseeable future. So if wages are flat, and energy prices rise, who do you think is going to deal with these consequences the most.....ummm that would be working Americans with flat wages.

So instead of acting like a complete phony, how about maning up and admitting that you are willing to have people pay more for energy, as well sacrificing working class jobs over environmental concerns.

You're dismissed .

[Philly]

There's a couple spelling errors in your post Libertarian, so expect Indy to address those rather than your points.

[Indy]

a) Somebody has already dealt with this argument, and
b) You've failed to demonstrate how China would have the upper hand economically except to say that... they'll be using coal for longer? So there's no alternative energy that would be cheaper than coal by then?



And again you fake concern for people loosing [sic] their jobs.

Something else already addressed in this thread.

Who's chasing their tale again?

Your whole construct is based on the idea that coal jobs would go away but nothing would come in to replace them.

Cough...

Like I've pointed out--these points have all already been answered. And if you're going to complain about intellectually dishonest, I would suggest you quit with the absurd fronting about how you care about working class or wage stagnation.

[Indy]

[Philly]

Lol you got nothin but ad Homs. Let someone who can actually argue take up this cause.

[Libertarian602]

[lnrw]

Considering obama's success rate, his underwhelming performance on anything and everything, why do the people think the china emission agreement will do what you imagine it will?

What makes you think it will happen at all?

What makes you think it won't cost far more than what it's projected to cost?

Which of obama's promises have been what he said they would be?

This will go for a huge shit just like everything he else he has promised.

I'm taking bets.

[Mr. Shaman]

[Libertarian602]

[lnrw]