No, your making yourself look even worse.
Here's the timeline of events:
Dylan: Wonders why these people aren't prosecuted.
Spider (who is agreeing with Dylan): But...how do we determine who is more or less negligent? (Asking a question, not making a statement, and certainly not claiming they shouldn't be prosecuted at all. Quite the opposite, in fact.)
Dylan: Guns are super dangerous and people who own them should be charged with negligent homicide!
Spider: Wait...what? Why weight the statistically less significant more than the significant? Why do these people get negligent homicide but those don't?
Exploited: *ad hom, ad hom* Stupid gun owners. Why do you think people should be exempted on the basis of rarity?
Spider: Wut. Who in the actual f**k said anything about exempting people from prosecution? (Because in fact, nobody said anything of the sort.)
Exploited: OMGWTF! Of course you said it. (basing his entire rant on an incorrect assumption before breaking out the well-worn straw man template.)
Spider: Where? Quote it.
etc etc etc as per the usual.
Does this help at all? You see where you went wrong? (I'm honestly trying to be productive right now.)