by exploited » Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:54 pm
I do understand what I've read. A bunch of unrelated herp-a-derps is the most accurate description I can think of right now.
It isn't immoral because the law says it is permissible, and it isn't immoral because someone thinks it isn't. I get it. You have nothing of value to contribute, and your opinion is almost totally without merit.
Was there any other fallacies you'd like to enter into the record?