Non's days of do-goodery may be drawing to a close...

[The Dharma Bum]

[John Galt]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age#Causes

there's a lot more to it than what you are saying. much more likely that celestial changes such as the muarunder minimum, volcanism, and changes to ocean salinity from the preceding warm period had something to do with it. i like the later theory because it shows a negative feedback loop, which is common in nature. you present a novel theory as fact and contort timelines in order to get it to work. sure, america was reforested after most all the natives died. but they died in the early 16th century, and america was largely reforested of its previous indigenous agricultural lands by the late 17th, which was the end of the little ice age.

[The Dharma Bum]

it's not a novel theory it is proven by the analysis of the population and of the byproducts of it's production. by science in other words

You think it is a novel theory in the same way you think the idea of anthropocentric climate change is a novel theory.

[John Galt]

anthropogenic climate change is not a novel theory, it's a hypothesis that has yet to have its asserts met within standard deviation. what you linked is a novel theory

[The Dharma Bum]

pure negationism

[The Dharma Bum]

"bah humbug"

lol

[Spider]

[wormwood]

[wormwood]

[The Dharma Bum]