I never asserted it as fact. I said I THINK. If you'd stayed in school you'd know that meant it was an OPINION. But due to the personal attacks and you and Indy basically saying I was an idiot for thinking that's what changed the election, I basically said ok then prove me wrong. Basically, YOU TELL ME what swayed the election since you seem to personally attack me for my opinion. After all, with personal attacks like that, then it should be very easy to prove I was incorrect. The problem is, it's not. I posted several articles and others opinions on the topic in the previous reply. They certainly don't qualify as proof because they are dated PRIOR to the election, but it certainly proves that people were speculating how Romneycare could hurt Romney's chances of being elected.
And considering no website can tell you why Romney wasn't elected as they can't read the minds of the voters, providing proof that it was going to be a hot topic during the elections certainly justifies my OPINION.
But it might shock you, I have a right to my opinion and not to be attacked for it. Your continued trolling is noted and reported.