Benghazi Fraud Exposed, Committee Still Exists

[Indy]

The only thing I'm "complaining" about is a bogus "investigation" that has zero to do with its purported goal and everything to do with the GOPs 2016 presidential run, being funded by taxpayers. We've already had more than one person in the Party acknowledge what it is, and the "leader" has been caught falsifying claims to further taint Clinton.

Although any rational person saw right through this from the beginning or, say, maybe the first SEVEN times.

It has nothing to do with defending Clinton and everything to do with... what's the term? Yup. Abuse of power.

[exploited]

It's a definite abuse of power. What structural changes would you like to make to how Congress decides to investigate something?

[Indy]

That's a different topic.

[Philly]

You said in the OP that it should be illegal. You can't just declare actions illegal ad hoc. You would need to have a law to make it illegal. Exploited is asking what law you would like to have.

[exploited]

[Indy]

[exploited]

[Philly]

[Indy]

[Philly]

Here's the problem Indy, and it's just the reality of the matter: politicians use government resources to further their political goals every day. All of them, in both parties. Every time a congressman goes back to his home district to toute an accomplishment that wil bring jobs to the district or provide a new service, he's basically campaigning, and it's totally legal because he's discussing government business. This committee is the same thing except it's negative. But the press conference touting your accomplishments is no less political in nature, so where do you draw the line?