by John Galt » Wed Apr 01, 2015 2:16 pm
uber, are you against the law or are you thinking that she is innocent?
if the latter your problem is with the people who found her guilty. but you also don't know all the facts. maybe her lawyer was shit. or maybe, just maybe, she was guilty. do you even think that's a possibility? that she could be guilty?
in this particular case there is evidence she bought pills from hong kong for terminating her pregnancy, she took those pills, and told people she took those pills. there is also evidence to suggest the child was alive at time of birth. unless she said she tried cpr or something how is it even "decredited" that the lungs would inflate without taking breath, when they 98% shown to be accurate according to methodological tests, and the 2% inaccuracies are false-negatives. i mean if she said she tried cpr maybe... but she didn't say she did that. instead she admitted to throwing the baby in a dumpster after lying about it in the first place.
she tried to kill the fetus with pills, that didn't work but caused problems. the baby died soon thereafter. what if the baby lived for an hour? someone found a crying baby in a dumpster? 10 days? a year? when is what she did "bad" to you? what has to happen? because the evidence suggests the baby was born alive after attempting to abort the child with illegal drugs after 9 weeks of pregnancy -- 9 weeks being the cutoff for when those drugs are legal
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.