What's the Dem's plan for their Kavanaugh hail-mary?

[NAB]

[JDHURF]

[Saz]

[exploited]

[John Galt]

[exploited]

[John Galt]

[exploited]

Each branch is supposed to check the other, but that doesn't happen either. So I guess you should just rewrite the Constitution and this new, perfecter system will resolve the need for unexpected problems to be resolved by a court.

The SC has obviously made numerous errors, but your expectations of a Constitutional Convention are both incredibly dangerous and, more importantly, not going to have the result you imagine. Do you sincerely believe that a government of millions people can write law so perfect and consistent that there will be no need for a small group to figure out what it means? What is the alternative here? You dislike Roe v. Wade because you believe it invents stuff out of whole cloth - show me a Supreme Court ruling that doesn't do that.

If that is what the Founders had in mind, they were more foolish than I thought.

[John Galt]

not saying it can't be resolved by the court. but i am saying if the law is silent on the matter you can't claim that the law speaks to us through its aura. it actually means the law is silent on the matter, which happily the law already states what to do in that situation: it is reserved to for the states to decide

[jimmyz]