AR-15 assault rifle used by teen to defend home

[uebermann]

[spacemonkey]

One thing the crimminals usually don't understand is the locked door is actually for their own protection aginst the man/woman standing on the other side with a gun.

[Medius]

[Professor]

[The Comrade]

no it's not. read the last 10 pages.

[dontworrybehappy]

Yes it is. Or it surely can be. In fact, since your "lawyer" said it's not violent, funny I can find a lawyer who says it is:

http://www.defenselawutah.com/CriminalD ... rimes.aspx


You just ignore everything that states you are wrong. Prof, even the f**k supreme court said burglary is violent, and what do these people do? Instead of accepting and learning, they continue to argue and embarrass themselves.

I can find several links stating that many states regard burglary as a violent crime. But not the actual statutes. Just people saying it. That's not worth much so I think there are too many variables to say that "all burglaries are non-violent" or "all are violent." But I will surely say that if someone is breaking into your house, just because you don't happen to be there at the moment, doesn't make his crime any better.

But please people, my OP wasn't about burglary being violent or not. It was supposed to be a thread about how assault rifles can be used for good. Not 15 pages of childish back and forth crap about whether this dog has a tail or not.

[The Comrade]

you said california lists it as a violent crime. when i quoted you the penal code stating it's not considered a violent crime unless one has a weapon or intent to cause harm to another you just ignored it. three people now have pointed out that the supreme court ruling deals with "career criminals" under the ACCA which you again ignored. now you're saying "it can be considered violent" which no one f**k denied in the first place that under certain circumstances it can be violent. but all you're doing here is trying to shift your position from an absolute; "burglary is a violent crime" to "burglary can be considered violent" so that you can prop up your initial argument AND be part of the group that is correct. you're not just being intellectually dishonest here you're just straight up being a liar.

as for your link i already pointed out how the federal department of justice does not consider burglary a violent crime, only robbery. so, again, wrong.


but lie some more, liar.

[The Comrade]

[Ben Huh]

[Ben Huh]