by The Comrade » Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:39 pm
if the only part of the theory you discuss is statist communism a la the soviet union and china you are functionally pigeonholing a huge, wide ranging ideology AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS (which none of you seem to want to deal with) in to a single outlet. so it's perfectly valid for me to go "okay if it's so flawed, what is an alternative to the ideas put forth by marx that also satisfy the same conclusions?" going "well capitalism of course" is just a dog shit of an argument in that context. it's blatantly circular and just self-defeating to keep going on if that's the course the discussion is going to take.
- These users thanked the author The Comrade for the post:
- The Dharma Bum