as already noted by Uber in another thread: there is no evidence the US government has given that backs up their claim that the Russian government was behind any of these "hacks" (well, phishing)
I do believe that the russians hacked hilldog. But I believe they did this years ago, in her dumbshit server. I am confident the Russians have all her emails that she "deleted" from her own server. I'm also confident they placed malware into the state department servers as a result of her treasonous incompetence. Is it still there? Who knows. But the Russians probably have some sleeper malware. Why draw attention? That isn't their style. Russians play cat and mouse spy stuff. They have submarines. They are covert not overt. Americans are far more overt, because MURICA BITCHES.
so in regards to this thing, someone on this planet phished podesta and then exposed him as incompetant and added more fuel to the fire about hillary's corruption. but the russian government? i don't think they would publish their findings. why would they do that? obvioulsy it fits the narrative of people who want to say that trump is illigitment, but stand back and think about it from a broader prospective. there's more to lose for a government engaged in constant spying with another government in exposing the fact they spied than keeping it to yourself. you draw attention and expose methods used, which then would plug holes and leave russia without insight that they previously had
so with no evidence that russia hacked, occam says they didn't because it doesn't make sense for them to expose their spy network