Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:53 am
Yeah but you're letting this president guy just put people in power without a vote. That's not direct democracy.
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:14 am
So your direct democracy would retain the senate which is anti democratic even on a representative level?
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by exploited » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:19 am
A democratic body chosen by popular vote is anti-democratic? Dude, the 17th Amendment...
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:20 am
The senate is an anti-democratic body because each state gets the same number of senators regardless of population. Like you said, it represents the states, not the people.
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:22 am
Sure it is.
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:26 am
I'm really not even sure where you're coming from ex. Even those who support our current model where California and Rhode Island both get 2 senators agree it's an undemocratic model.
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by exploited » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:31 am
Its not undemocratic at all, IMO, but if it is, pass a measure to change it. Totally irrelevant to the discussion.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: Your Definition of Non-Violent Protests
by Philly » Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:33 am
It's relevant if you're telling me under your proposed system we would still have the senate.
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 92 guests