Page 1 of 8
Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:47 pm
by Precocity
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:17 pm
by WizardfromOz
Its called tapping on the window. What was the worst that could happen?
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:45 pm
by Davethulhu
Photo enforcement is bullsh*t.
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:46 pm
by WizardfromOz
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:49 am
by Precocity
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:52 am
by WizardfromOz
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:32 am
by dontworrybehappy
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:58 am
by Precocity
If the lawyer had only used that reasoning in his letter. Question the validity of the traffic cams not question the authority of the city. He's basically saying that USPS is above the law not that the means of enforcing the law is bad.
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:13 am
by Stratego
Why is a lawyer fighting a $700 claim?
Re: Postal Service claims immunity from local traffic laws
Posted:
Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:16 am
by Precocity
Now that is a good question Stratego.