by Professor » Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:38 am
Yes, it should be allowed. And, this is a good case of where it should be exercised.
As a condition of citizenship, you are forced to give up your property to the state for the betterment of society every day. We like to call them "taxes". This is no different. In order to provide millions of dollars to the surrounding community, and to provide a training place for the people who defend your country, one person has to give up his personal property.
I went through this a few years back. The road going to our hospital was built to accommodate roughly 5000 cars/day. It was a 2-lane road, with no shoulder. As the town grew to over 50,000, and our hospital went from 80 beds to 450, the road remained the same. Adding insult to injury, Petro built the nations 2nd-largest truck stop between the city (and interstate) and the hospital. To reach the hospital, you had to drive past row upon row of 18-wheelers trying to pull across the highway, dragging their trailers. Inevitably, traffic would stop, and the truckers would be stuck blocking both lanes of travel for minutes at a time. Our local ambulance service estimated that it took 4 minutes to travel the .5 mile stretch between the interstate and our hospital.
So, we pushed for Federal money to expand the highway. And, we got it. But, the plans that were approved by DOTD involved taking the parking lot for a corner bar. And, because the bar would have been too close to the road, it also required tearing it down.
Therefore, for the good of the thousands of people that needed life-saving services, the decision was made (championed by yours truly, via public and door-to-door meetings) to expropriate the land, and compensate the bar owner.