by Indy » Thu May 22, 2014 10:13 am
a) Who would object to "environmentally-friendly" candidates in any instance?
b) That said, this is what happens when we decide that money = political (free) speech and can be given to anybody. I can't see the article because of a paywall, but let me guess: does he even live in any of those seven places where he's using his free speech for the candidates?