Material witness held for almost three years

[exploited]

[eynon81]

f**k judge. f**k DAs.

scalp hunting man. the government are a bunch of f**k scalp hunters.


lucky for me....I'm bald.

[Medius]

The most they should be able to do is charge him as an accessory and go to trial with what evidence they have. I don't agree with coercive detainment. I can't imagine how after a few months it doesn't automatically become punitive sans due process (or as I like to call it, illegal).

[eynon81]

[Southern Dad]

What other way do they have to make this man show up at the trial? Maybe they should have held the trial a little sooner and not allowed so many delays. Of course, it's a lot harder to get a conviction without a body but if the kid has confessed to the murder???

[exploited]

[Medius]

[The dane]

After three years you can't really claim to be holding the man for questioning, at that point you are just imprisoning him without a trial. Unless they have something to charge him with, he should have been released a long, long time ago.

Obviously this would not be happening if he knew his rights and could afford a decent lawyer, but it seems he doesn't, so Oregon has apparently decided to take advantage of his lack of power/knowledge. Just another example of Justice not being blind at all.

[eynon81]

[Jean Dubois]