Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
35 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
by Boris Johnson » Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:53 pm
Great OP.
- These users thanked the author Boris Johnson for the post:
- Indy
-
Boris Johnson - Governor
- Posts: 3341
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:55 am
- Location: City Hall The Queens Walk, City of London
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 190 times
- Political Leaning: Slightly Conservative
Re: Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
by Boris Johnson » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:12 pm
Last edited by Boris Johnson on Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Boris Johnson - Governor
- Posts: 3341
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:55 am
- Location: City Hall The Queens Walk, City of London
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 190 times
- Political Leaning: Slightly Conservative
Re: Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
by Professor » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:12 pm
My prediction?
That anyone supporting the overturn of AA in this thread will be labeled a racist.
That anyone supporting the overturn of AA in this thread will be labeled a racist.
-
Professor - VIP
- Posts: 7553
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: New Orleans, LA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 570 times
- Political Leaning: Rockefeller Republican
Re: Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
by Professor » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:10 pm
OK, then I'll wade in with both feet.
Race should never be used as a factor when deciding on employment, admissions, receipt of public funds, or almost any other choice. When these types of choices are made, a reason must be documented OTHER than race why one person was chosen over another. The government shall continue to monitor for discriminatory actions or discriminatory effects (ie: policies that are not racially discriminatory in and of themselves, but result in discrimination), and punish as necessary to remedy the situation and disuade future discriminatory actions.
Race should never be used as a factor when deciding on employment, admissions, receipt of public funds, or almost any other choice. When these types of choices are made, a reason must be documented OTHER than race why one person was chosen over another. The government shall continue to monitor for discriminatory actions or discriminatory effects (ie: policies that are not racially discriminatory in and of themselves, but result in discrimination), and punish as necessary to remedy the situation and disuade future discriminatory actions.
-
Professor - VIP
- Posts: 7553
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:42 pm
- Location: New Orleans, LA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 570 times
- Political Leaning: Rockefeller Republican
Re: Legal Eagle: 2012-2013 Supreme Court Docket
by Sazari » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:03 pm
But it's efficient. You want to do something inefficient because it's not "fair" in a somewhat marginal way?
-
Sazari - Governor
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:08 pm
- Location: The most prestigious place in the world: ASIA
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 127 times
- Political Leaning: Rockefeller Republican
35 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests