My position is if you vote for a republican or democrat you're part of the problem not the solution. Yes, there are differences between the two parties but for the most part they are the same shit doing the bidding for the same corporate overlords.
There are two primary reasons why I think a second Obama term would be better than a first Romney term.
1. Obama would be president a second and final term. There would be no real incentive for the republicans to try f**k Obama on everything in order to get him out of the white house since he would be leaving anyway. I found that the two parties work better together during a presidents second term opposed to a first.
2. Trickle-down economics just doesn't work and that's exactly what Romney will try to implement. Wealthy people do not make business decisions based on current tax code. When they get tax breaks they end up just keeping that money. The degree of deregulation that the republicans favor is dangerous as well. During the last few years of Clinton's presidency deregulation began. It continued under Bush as well as tax breaks primarily geared toward the rich. Where were all the jobs created? All we got was additional debt. Anyone who buys into trickle-down economics are a fool. This doesn't mean that the dems have brilliant economic ideas. However, the general principle of growing the middle-class instead of hooking up the wealthy and waiting for wealth to trickle down is more sound.