^Mostly incorrect. Obviously you're still stinging.
Already covered most of this months Its speaks to basic logical failings of your entire philosophy. That being that YOU and those who think in your mode are the biggest barriers to real and lasting change that we have to overcome:
Basically, the rejection of the middle ground is just another way of describing a demand for ideological purity. And a foundation for fascism. You're starting to fall in line with hard right nutjobs who want a theocratic state that would rule with the flaming sword of Godly Vengeance. You love change when its the change you want. But what about the people who don't agree with you? How are you planning on silencing them, since you aren't willing to compromise? How are you planning on responding when the change is against you?
The reason we find compromises, the reason we have intentionally designed an adversarial political system designed to force the development of those compromises, is that when you've got a whole bunch of black and white, the only thing that's going to be at least somewhat acceptable to both is some kind of a shade of grey.
You want to just delete the other side of that gradient and find a pure product that you find appealing, and simply write off the dissenters. It doesn't work that way. Politics doesn't work that way. Life doesn't work that way.
There are situations that demand immediate, draconian change...if the people are of that opinion. Not just a few who want to just make it happen
right now and to hell with everyone else because they're childish and have no attention span, demanding instant gratification. Change for change's sake, as opposed to rationality. Impulse over reason.
More generally though, change must be gradual. Its entirely fruitless to pretend that gigantic sweeping reforms that run contrary to entrenched political, sociological, and ideological structures are going to actually happen. Conservatism, in its most basic breakdown, amounts to a fundamental and un-moving resistance to change. That's really what its all about. And, conservatism is half of the equation. So...we have to deal with this inescapable reality. Unless you want to go down the already mentioned fascist dictator route. If I had a magic wand...damn. I'd go through and cause a reordering of society so immediate and severe that I think a million people would probable stroke out in rage and drop dead.
But, we don't have magic wands, so this obvious wishful thinking is just that.
The reality, despite your obliviousness to it, is that I'm interested in change that is possible. Change that can actually come to pass in some sort of realistic time frame. Change that can be real, lasting, and meaningful.
You, on the other hand, constantly seem to be demanding change that is fantasy. Change that is politically, socially, or fiscally impossible. You aren't interested in change...you are interested in pontificating about ideologically pure ideals that make you feel good. You aren't interested in actual possibilities. That would be too hard. Easier to demand implausibilities and decry those actually doing something useful.
Don't talk to me about the status quo unless your willing to actually support changing it. Because people like you, demanding all the marbles, are the primary thing holding up defeating that status quo. You people are the problem.
Join us over here in the pro-change camp, Ex. Don't be a poser.
Oh. And as for your apparent belief that the office of the POTUS will magically be empowered to make radical things happen against the wishes of the government and the people...sorry. It simply doesn't work that way. This is grade 10 stuff, Ex.
I support Sanders not because I think he can actually raise taxes to the order of trillions and give everyone free tuition while breaking up the banks, and I reject Trump not because I think he can actually build a thousand mile fortified wall and deport millions of people. None of that is going to happen, in either case. Best to not drink that koolaid.