by dontworrybehappy » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:03 pm
No, nobody has to prove an earwitness wrong. They DO have the burden of proof to prove Zimmerman wrong.
I haven't been keeping up with the trial but I saw an interview with a lady who said that she didn't know who a witness was, but that he basically stated everything that Zimmerman said as what he saw that night. She thought the defense had put up a great witness, and come to find out, it was the prosecutions witness. She said the prosecution shot itself in the foot on Friday.
Remember, the burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. There are TONS of reasonable doubt so far. I say he walks.
"Police protection" is an oxymoron. Gun laws are like masturbation, they both feel really good, but after you're done you realize you haven't accomplished anything."