by Spider » Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:23 pm
No.
The government's role is a large plurality of things.
What I said was, "I can't see how government working in such a way as to allow for the happiness of the people is such a bad thing." And I stand by that. This does not conflict at all with government not defining fun.
Please don't misquote me. I made no statement that "the government's role is to provide for fun". I said, "Fun and convenience are pretty much the number 1 and 2 considerations when it comes to how the majority of people want to spend their money."
The point you are trying to make is completely retarded...especially considering you were forced to misquote me to make it.