http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/miller/120911
I surprised myself when reading this article by actually agreeing more with the person she was talking about than with the author herself, who came across to me as religious to the point of cretinism.
The fact that she couldn't see the distinction between a 'paedophile' and a 'child molester' was telling (for those who don't know, the difference is between one of desiring to do something and actually carrying it out). And she seemed to me to have a medieval attitude to denying the very existence of brain disorders and mental illness and it all down to having a blackened soul.
Anyhow, my own opinion on the topic is this. Paedophiles, or at least the non-practicing ones, may well deserve our sympathy for being afflicted with something beyond their control, but that does not mean that such sympathy should transform itself into acceptance of them carrying out their fantasies. Perhaps in her own inarticulate way, this is the crux of what the author of the above article was trying to get at amidst all that stuff about Jesus...