Should parents be charged when a child uses their gun?

[Bauce]

[dontworrybehappy]

And according to the 2nd amendment, that should be everyone.

Can you define "destroys liberty?" Because until we can put a concrete definition on that phrase, we will never give you an answer that you could be happy with.

[Bauce]

[dontworrybehappy]

[Bauce]

[Bauce]

I just thought of something though. Shouldn't parents be allowed to pass their guns down to their (grown) children? If the kids are mentally stable, I'd think so. We'd have to figure out something for this.

[dontworrybehappy]

Ok so your definition of "destroy liberty" is what? I still don't get it. Are you defining liberty as the right to buy a gun from a private seller or to own a firearm? If so, your definition is very far off.

What you have to realize is that having to go through an FFL dealer is simply a back door way to tracking guns. And should the gov't want to confiscate all guns one day, it's much easier if you know exactly who owns what. An FFL dealer has to keep records of the purchase. It's not JUST the background check, although I think losing your right to own a gun for ANY non violent crime is insane. It's also almost like another form of Obamacare, the gov't forcing me to pay a private company or citizen for something. Of course Obamacare is even worse, but still.

If I want to sell my property to my cousin, I should have a right to. Period.

[Bauce]

[dontworrybehappy]

I just did.

If nothing more than the name is run and no record of the gun sold, serial number of the gun, type of gun, how many guns or any information is kept, and it is JUST for the background check of yes or no, then I'm fine with it. And it has to be free. But it's not either of those, so yes, I'm against it.

[Bauce]