by exploited » Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:15 pm
Please explain how I am f**k them up. You've said I am, but you've offered no evidence or specific reason for saying so. Whereas I think the evidence I just posted, as well as the evidence I posted on the first page, supports my position quite clearly.
The difference between a violent psychotic and a teenager is that reckless, immature and irresponsible behaviour from a teenager is normal and they can be reasonably expected to change given time to mature. That is not the case with a violent psychotic, who requires constant treatment and medication, and will never adjust normally, on their own.
Make an actual point with actual evidence, or concede you were talking out your ass. I think the evidence I've given cannot possibly be anymore clear.