Is feminism becoming an obsolete movement?

[The Dharma Bum]

Let me ask you a question.

Does a donor who donates sperm to a sperm bank share responsibility with the women who conceives with his DNA?

If not, then your premise that the responsibility is shared simply because the DNA is shared is dispelled.

What other justifications for your shared responsibility do you have? Those put forward so far are not sufficient and can be dismissed without further comment.

[exploited]

So you want to give prospective fathers the right to veto any reproductive decision, and if that veto is not obeyed, the right to walk away from all responsibility for their child?

You're a chauvanist, through and through. Disgusting.

[The Dharma Bum]

In simplest terms it is logically inconsistent to claim something is a shared responsibility when only one person has any input into the decision making process.

What about that?

[Spider]

[Spider]

[exploited]

[Spider]

We've already been over the whole sperm donation thing. It was a nonstarter then as now.

Talk about a red herring.

[The Dharma Bum]

[The Dharma Bum]

[Spider]

I think its telling that the only recourse you have left is to toss in a SPERM BANK. Literally the only possible way to get a socially and legally exempt pregnancy facilitiated through a sanctioned and commonly understood legal framework that leaves the biological father anonymous!

If that's what you've been reduced to, then you're done.

More importantly, if you are so fire and brimstone about this idea, why can't you can't even admit to supporting it?

Answer the question, Dharma:

So you want to give prospective fathers the right to veto any reproductive decision, and if that veto is not obeyed, the right to walk away from all responsibility for their child?


I know, I know, but Deja vu can be fun, too.