And one other thing to mention about a shift back towards a higher cost:content ratio; I kind of think I enjoyed the end product more back when it wasn't all just out there for virtually free. In the 90's, when I went to get a new album, I would put a lot of thought into which CD to buy. Once I chose my purchase, I would of course listen to it right away, same as I do when I choose a new song/album to stream today. The difference is that today, if a song doesn't jump out and appeal to me right away, there's so much more free content out there, so I probably move on and forget about it. Back then, if I didn't like the album I just spent my money on, I'd listen to it all the way through at least 3 or 4 more times, before casting a final judgment. And I can honestly say that my favorite album in the world didn't do much for me the first or even the second time I listened to it. If I first came across it today, I guess I would have just dismissed it and moved on.
I'm not saying this to be a luddite or a nostalgic "back in the day it was better" douchebag. I know that digital music isn't going anywhere and I'm glad for that (CDs skipped and scratched, good riddance) but I do think that making everything so available for next to nothing has cheapened the product and in many cases is diminishing our enjoyment of it. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if I had to commit to an album again like I used to.