by The Comrade » Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:12 pm
please don't compare yourself to kane, it's insulting to him and it shant be tolerated.
anyways, what i said was related. you've disagreed with everyone's opinion on ukraine, regardless of where it falls on the realistic vs idealistic spectrum of foreign policy. you are a contrarion. there's really nothing controversial about that statement. i could agree with everything you've said right now and you'd have to fight the urge to not find a reason to argue with it. and the fact that your only position is post-hoc only hammers that point home.
i mean spider suggested he wouldn't support war unless something serious happened and the rest of NATO was involved. your response was becoming completely unhinged.
me and galts is to stop them now: unhinged
kane has had probably the most depressingly realistic take on the whole situation and on our foreign policy in general. as in, he's discussed what actually will/is happening: totally unhinged
you aren't having a big boy discussion, you're having a temper tantrum with kane and, surprise, strawmanning the hell out of him.
this has been a PSA from the PCF Poster Improvement Board™