But again Prof the "how" really doesn't matter in this case when the NBA has an image to protect.
I agree the case is shoddy all-around but they certainly can argue that he's only going to hurt their image/business, especially if players start striking in protest.
Constitutional vs employer rights
42 posts
• Page 4 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Constitutional vs employer rights
by Indy » Fri May 16, 2014 11:20 am
How would you even regulate the former?
But yeah I'm sure they can say something along the lines of "Our policy is that diversity and equality are what we demand of all players, coaches and employees/owners of the NBA. Any actions/words that violate that policy are terms for immediate dismissal."
But yeah I'm sure they can say something along the lines of "Our policy is that diversity and equality are what we demand of all players, coaches and employees/owners of the NBA. Any actions/words that violate that policy are terms for immediate dismissal."
-
Indy - VIP
- Posts: 8547
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:46 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian Socialist
Re: Constitutional vs employer rights
by Mr.Bill » Fri May 16, 2014 11:26 am
He signed the agreement that said the NBA can oust him with 3/4's vote.. That's all they need. The other stuff is just talk(no pun intended).. His 'expectations' about that conversation mean nothing..
It went public, it hurt the NBA's business, they can and will oust him..
It went public, it hurt the NBA's business, they can and will oust him..
- Mr.Bill
- VIP
- Posts: 3548
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:13 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
42 posts
• Page 4 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 71 guests