What is the goddamn point Dharma? Spell it out.
"SOCIAL SCIENTISTS ARE SCIENTISTS THEREFORE MY OPINION IS RIGHT!!!!"
Is that really all you have to offer this discussion?
Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
Re: Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
by The Dharma Bum » Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:26 pm
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
by Spider » Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:29 pm
Last edited by Spider on Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Spider - VIP
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:38 pm
- Location: Out in the sticks.
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 1067 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
by The Dharma Bum » Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:32 pm
your point was that social science isn't real science, that is what you replied to me
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
by The Dharma Bum » Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:36 pm
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Hypothetical: What if ISIS makes a successful Caliphate?
by Spider » Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:36 pm
Dharma, you literally just claimed that achaeologists study the fossil record and have some say in the study of evolution.
Sorry man, but you simply don't know what you're talking about. Why is it so important to you to present sociologists trying to decide why people do they crazy things they do as being on the same empirical level as a physicist explaining angular momentum?
That is WHY the world of academics has created a distinction between the hard sciences and social sciences. One isn't better than the other, but clearly one is better supported by the empirical and mathematical as opposed to the consensus and the postulation.
What's actually happening here is that you want to be able to "prove" your opinions on social issues in the same way that a chemist can prove how much of a compound can be produced before running out of a limiting reactant. And that is NEVER going to happen. Sorry, but this social stuff is always going to be wishy washy compared to hard science.
Sorry man, but you simply don't know what you're talking about. Why is it so important to you to present sociologists trying to decide why people do they crazy things they do as being on the same empirical level as a physicist explaining angular momentum?
That is WHY the world of academics has created a distinction between the hard sciences and social sciences. One isn't better than the other, but clearly one is better supported by the empirical and mathematical as opposed to the consensus and the postulation.
What's actually happening here is that you want to be able to "prove" your opinions on social issues in the same way that a chemist can prove how much of a compound can be produced before running out of a limiting reactant. And that is NEVER going to happen. Sorry, but this social stuff is always going to be wishy washy compared to hard science.
Last edited by Spider on Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Spider - VIP
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:38 pm
- Location: Out in the sticks.
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 1067 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests