Ok, some points
1) Given what happened in southern Louisiana with Katrina (a disaster management f**k of epic proportions), some sort of national emergency infrastructure seems like a good idea. Thing is by bringing in people like alec jones you suddenly jump form something that frankly is fairly neutral to even potentially beneficial in its intent to it instantly being sinister, and invidence in and of itself of a sinister conspiracy.
2) Again Ron Paul has a flair for the dramatic, that he's somehow privy to some massive conspiracy in virtue of being a congressman is prehaps plausible. But if this conspiracy is so omnipresent and powerful and most important sinister, then why does he get to go around shouting about it, or even hinting at it?
3) Whilst im familiar with the works of Malthus and agree with their general import, I could disagree that most of the powerful people and organisations appears to be particularly concerned with it, certainly there is much written on the notion of unlimited progress being the primary assumption behind economic policy. Population control is certaintly not a sinister policy, 7 billion certaintly is not sustainable. But I suppose that's neither here nor there, my point is merely that if the CCP can't do it, why could some shadowy cabal.
4) These elites you speak of clearly owing their wealth to large organised civil society, why would they then seek to destroy that by reducing the world population to levels of what 400ad? Less manpower, hell of a lot less wealth creation.
5) Not sure what im meant to infer from this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
6) Sorry but Alec Jones has made quite a tidy living out of cherry picking evidence to build grand narratives of evil conspiracies, I don't consider him credible.