by Ben Huh » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:45 pm
Wait, wasn't citing the decisions by proper authorities the basis of your entire argument? Did you not use their decisions to state your case? Sure you did. Now that those same sources say the occupation is legal independent of the annexation attempt, you try and turn it around on me. Try again.
Last edited by
Ben Huh on Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
..."if the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of a divine reward, then brother, that person is a piece of shit."
- These users thanked the author Ben Huh for the post:
- Saz