by Lobster » Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:21 am
I agree, and I argued the same case at the time. it's why I put "secular" in quotes when describing the FSA. They were obviously trying to ride the coattails of the Arab Spring and courting western support by appealing to their delicate sensibilities ("secular", lol), but it was clear even then that the same thing that happened in Egypt would eventually happen there, should Assad step down peacefully. As fundamentally islamic as the Brotherhood may be though, they're not nearly on the level of ISIS. The hardcore islamist militias only started appearing once it was clear the FSA couldn't stand alone against Assad and the "west" was not going to intervene in their favour. Saying the "west" wanted to fund ISIS (and did so) is disingenuous gobshittery, fit only for people like Dharma.
Last edited by
Lobster on Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.