by The Dharma Bum » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:19 am
I didn't say "yes" I pointed out what the objective and biased viewpoints are. You are the one resorting to the chicanery of moralism in lieu of a valid argument.
In doing this, you are using emotionalist blather to cover the fact that what you are really saying is that in your version of morality the lives of german and japanese civilians are of less consequence than the lives of other civilian populations
I do not agree with that assumption