by John Galt » Tue Oct 07, 2014 10:36 am
they are not sick anymore than someone with glasses is sick but it is still a defect because it decreases fitness, which is defined as ability for genes to survive and reproduce. it doesn't increase the fitness of close relatives to a point where it is worth it (as i showed it would need each gay to save 8+ nieces and nephews who otherwise would have died in order for enough of the similar genes to have made it for this to be worth it). it's undesirable from an evolutionary standpoint, so it is by definition a defect. to say otherwise is delusional.
also when "society" spoke in this country it was actually the opposite. what led us to this point wasn't "society" but old men in robes. when "society" spoke they did so democratically and almost always said the opposite of what you claim.
again with the delusions.
perhaps you should speak to someone about this? just trying to help.
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.