by Spider » Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:53 pm
I don't have a problem with rights being extended to persons...but only if they can be empirically proven to be persons. A solid, *testable*, definition for personhood, which doesn't hinge on philosophical ruminations and double-think, would have to be developed. I think certain species of apes and maybe marine mammals could qualify.
In the meantime, protections can be maintained. There is no reason to cause undue pain and suffering. People who abuse animals can continue to go to prison for their crimes. Of course, since millions of animals are harvested for food every day, there is always going to be some measure of this pain and suffering. Short of some sort of tofu self-abuse revolution, this isn't going to change. We're apex predators.
Difference between us and other predators is that we'll blow an animal's mind, killing it like flipping a switch, painlessly. A lion on the other hand will pull some animal's guts out and start eating them while their prey is still alive and screaming.
Maybe if the lion is deemed a person and given rights, it should also be held accountable for its actions.