by Indy » Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:13 am
And there you have it.
So tell us: who would be an "objective" source on this?
You've now labeled him as "anti-gun," I'm "anti-gun" and a liberal, I'm surprised nobody has bashed the Rolling Stone piece as both as well, so I'd like to know who would anybody accept as "objective."
Because from my seat anybody who questions the status quo/NRA is "anti-gun."