Republican Civil War; ALWAYS Entertaining!!

[Philly]

[Libertarian602]

The fireworks would be entertaining, but I honestly don't know who is gonna want to face off with the Clinton machine. Of course, that's what folks were saying back in 2008. All the elites seem to be quietly backing Clinton, and in the end their big money seems to be the only thing to matter when it comes to winning presidential elections. Mark my words, we'll see over a half a billion spent to buy 2016, if not more.

[Libertarian602]

[Philly]

The obviously untrue?

[Libertarian602]

[Philly]

lolwut? Ok enough of your trolling back to the topic:

Clinton probably takes this because there's no high profile lefty hero who wants to take her down. Even Obama, who seemed to come out of nowhere to wreck her in 08 was much more high profile than say Martin O'Malley. I think the real rumblings begin while she is in office as we look forward, assuming she wins that is.

[Libertarian602]

This thread was troll to begin with, but I guess pointing out facts as they are is considered trolling, roll with it guy.

[Philly]

You aren't pointing out facts, you're talking about circlejerks and koolaid cause you're mad about something.

[Libertarian602]

House democrats in smallest minority since 1930's: Check http://www.wsj.com/articles/house-democ ... 0?mobile=y

President can't work with his own party: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/21508 ... lk-to-them: Check

Exit of moderate Democrats: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/us ... wanted=all: Check

Chuck Shumer criticizes passing Obamacare: http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress ... e-20141125: Check

Oh ya, Harry Rid blames White House: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... _story.htm
Check
You were saying Philly?

[Philly]

lol none of that is remotely on topic. We're talking about progressives challenging Hillary Clinton. Try to keep up.