Are we going to fix our spam problem?

[Philly]

[exploited]

If we start banning people just because they are annoying, there will be nobody left.

[Professor]

Trolling it is then.

Eric, please change title to "Are we going to fix our trolling problem?"

All other content can remain the same, since he's obviously a troll.

[Philly]

[exploited]

[Winchester]

[John Galt]

[Winchester]

[Philly]

I can understand from a utilitarian standpoint that Shaman rubs a lot of people the wrong way and that's an issue for the site, but I genuinely think he's here to discuss politics. He's probably not all there mentally and I think he definitely has difficulty comprehending what other people are saying to him, but believe it or not some of us genuinely find his posts interesting as well. Not saying this means he should get a pass, but don't assume he's just here to intentionally cause trouble cause I don't think that's the case at all.

[John Galt]

yeah necromancy is something that could not be programatically fixed. i don't mind if someone brings up something from the past. for example, i found a thread where i made a prediction of the court unanimously agreeing with my position, and the dude laughing about how it would be split, and the other way. so once it was unanimous in my favor i had to cast necromancy lvl 100 on that thread in jubilation. but shaman is just casting it on random things