by John Galt » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:32 pm
first of all, you're the one who introduced the term "conspiracy wingnut". if you prefer i will just call you a conspiracy theorist. however, such people -- like yourself -- are delusional when it comes to these things.
you're exposing yourself even more as one now. apparently there is some special significance to have seen the [thing in question]. finding several websites from places like popular mechanics pointing out the scope of the theory would have to involve such amounts of people it just strains imagination. or as bloomberg points out, "the film offers no dissenting interpretation of his [Stalcup's] facts, or even outside acknowledgment that his facts are facts." it certainly doesn't hold up against ockram's razor. so why do i even need to watch it? what is so special about it that you have to watch for yourself to see? why can't i trust what other people have written about it? "Why even waste my time? You've got it all figured out because you've got links from the internets and the movie told you so. Look at you go!"
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.