I have to say though, it's pretty obvious to me by the substance (or lack thereof) within your last few replies that you're trolling, in fact perhaps you have been all along. If so, congratulations, you've killed a few hours of boredom for both of us. Honestly I just can't see your last reply as anything else, considering you've now effectively ignored precedence, historically factual data, you are arguing against your own Asylum Tribunal's judgment, and still searching for any way at all to dismiss, confuse, and otherwise distract from that which has long since proven your own extremely naive assertions r.e. free speech as complete bollocks.
Thing is, I don't choose to spend my time unnecessarily entertaining these tiny irritations, and I'm not here for the purpose of eternal reiteration, anymore than I would knowingly contribute to this thread devolving further into off-topic, laborious nonsense. You've now prodded forth and extracted some fairly abysmal straw-man fallacies from my posts, 5 times already. Really lil bit, I offered the benefit of doubt for your original argument, but at this point the content you are trying to extract and rearrange from my replies has to be purposefully obtuse, otherwise your falling dangerously close to the level of blundering idiot.
Either way, practice your 'circular argument shuffle' in another thread, with someone who finds this happy crap entertaining. Personally I find this sort of never-ending dance to be an insufferable bore. I'd much rather pick a scab or commit ritual seppuko. If and when you, Boris, or I can be assed enough to start a Geert "Ban The Quran" Wilders thread, we can certainly have at a proper and objective debate ad-infinitum, but this OP just not the appropriate place for it.
In other words...
