Okay, so your new position is that this is part of a regular cycle of warming and cooling and not a very very long summer. That's much more defensible and I'm glad you've dropped your original line of argumentation.
I'm intrigued that you're also now admitting that glaciers are melting. I thought your original point was that glaciers aren't melting and so global climate change is a "hoax"? You're not being very consistent.
One thing this highlights is that your belief is not science-driven. You've reached a conclusion (global warming is a hoax) and now you're trying to find premises for your conclusion. One premise (it's just a super long summer) was shot down, so now you're trying another. Another premise (glaciers aren't really melting) was shot down, so now you're trying another. Even you can see the lack of logic here, right?