For the Trek people:
Re: For the Trek people:
by John Galt » Fri Dec 11, 2015 6:07 pm
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
-
John Galt - Technical Admin
- Posts: 14869
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:22 pm
- Location: Bowling Green Massacre Survivor
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1497 times
- Political Leaning: Classic Liberal
Re: For the Trek people:
by John Galt » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:45 pm
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
-
John Galt - Technical Admin
- Posts: 14869
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:22 pm
- Location: Bowling Green Massacre Survivor
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1497 times
- Political Leaning: Classic Liberal
Re: For the Trek people:
by Spider » Fri Dec 11, 2015 9:12 pm
From your post...had no way to know you knew. All I saw was a comment about the result, not the cause. Deep breaths.
-
Spider - VIP
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:38 pm
- Location: Out in the sticks.
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 1067 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: For the Trek people:
by phosphide » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:06 pm
We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will yet swell the chorus when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
- Abraham Lincoln
- Abraham Lincoln
- phosphide
- Senator
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:37 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 61 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian
Re: For the Trek people:
by The Comrade » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:55 pm
you've mentioned one movie in almost every point you made. that would be okay if there weren't 12 of them. plus voyage home was fun.
-
The Comrade - Vice President
- Posts: 18439
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Yugoslavia
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 1212 times
- Been thanked: 1889 times
- Political Leaning: Socialist
Re: For the Trek people:
by phosphide » Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:11 am
I mentioned humpback whales twice, which isn't most of my points newb.
We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will yet swell the chorus when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
- Abraham Lincoln
- Abraham Lincoln
- phosphide
- Senator
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:37 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 61 times
- Political Leaning: Libertarian
-
The Comrade - Vice President
- Posts: 18439
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Yugoslavia
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 1212 times
- Been thanked: 1889 times
- Political Leaning: Socialist
Re: For the Trek people:
by John Galt » Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:59 pm
when the ncc-1701-d was destroyed, it crashed into a planet, but the ncc-1701 of abrambverse is a submarine-VTOL-intergalatic ship. spider is absolutely right that doesn't make any damn sense. even if we say "okay they can go faster than the speed of light" that doesn't make gravity or the atmosphere function any differently
star trek: the motion picture was a star trek movie, through and through. even though i didn't think it was particularly great, it wasn't a shoot-em-up-in-space. star wars came about and that challenged star trek, so we get star trek 2: wrath of khan. this was brilliant. it has some amazing stuff in it, about the genesis project, but also the shoot em ups that people now wanted to be dazzled by. but it still kept to its roots.
star trek first contact also similarly hit on great themes from the series (borg, time travel, sex with robots) but had a lot of action. i'm fine with a lot of action. i liked DS9 the best actually, and that was action-packed most times. star trek insurrection was more like a glorified episode of TNG, which, is great, but it was made for star trek fans.
and so there is the delimma... how can you justify the expense of a giant movie just peddling to the trekkies? you can't. so the options are, don't make a movie, or destroy the heart of star trek. well money is money right
so "star trek beyond" is the first post-abrams trek, and will be cowritten by simon peg. and according to this "Pegg and ("confessed trekkie") Lin are ready to take the NCC-1701 out on that Five Year Mission we've heard so much about." http://moviepilot.com/posts/3677714 i have high hopes for this. it's the 50th anniversary of star trek, and they are still making movies, which is awesome. and as spider noted, there's a tv series with CBS possibly in the works -- possibly with the "original prime timeline" (tos/e/tng/ds9/v). it's clear trek has staying power, even if it's not dazzling. i mean three seperate series of 7 seasons? what other show can compare? i think this new movie can keep some of the exciting elements abrams broguht, and take us back to the roots of star trek, gaining fans in the process. star trek should be highly philosophical. it should challenge viewers. and it should "make sense" (aside from the two fantasy elements of teleportation and FTL).
star trek: the motion picture was a star trek movie, through and through. even though i didn't think it was particularly great, it wasn't a shoot-em-up-in-space. star wars came about and that challenged star trek, so we get star trek 2: wrath of khan. this was brilliant. it has some amazing stuff in it, about the genesis project, but also the shoot em ups that people now wanted to be dazzled by. but it still kept to its roots.
star trek first contact also similarly hit on great themes from the series (borg, time travel, sex with robots) but had a lot of action. i'm fine with a lot of action. i liked DS9 the best actually, and that was action-packed most times. star trek insurrection was more like a glorified episode of TNG, which, is great, but it was made for star trek fans.
and so there is the delimma... how can you justify the expense of a giant movie just peddling to the trekkies? you can't. so the options are, don't make a movie, or destroy the heart of star trek. well money is money right
so "star trek beyond" is the first post-abrams trek, and will be cowritten by simon peg. and according to this "Pegg and ("confessed trekkie") Lin are ready to take the NCC-1701 out on that Five Year Mission we've heard so much about." http://moviepilot.com/posts/3677714 i have high hopes for this. it's the 50th anniversary of star trek, and they are still making movies, which is awesome. and as spider noted, there's a tv series with CBS possibly in the works -- possibly with the "original prime timeline" (tos/e/tng/ds9/v). it's clear trek has staying power, even if it's not dazzling. i mean three seperate series of 7 seasons? what other show can compare? i think this new movie can keep some of the exciting elements abrams broguht, and take us back to the roots of star trek, gaining fans in the process. star trek should be highly philosophical. it should challenge viewers. and it should "make sense" (aside from the two fantasy elements of teleportation and FTL).
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
-
John Galt - Technical Admin
- Posts: 14869
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:22 pm
- Location: Bowling Green Massacre Survivor
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1497 times
- Political Leaning: Classic Liberal
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests