by NAB » Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:41 am
I guess I look at it a bit differently. While I'm no fan of Clinton and his behavior (I remember how embarrassing it was to see him flat out lie on tv), I guess Bush's actions as president were more disgraceful to me if one were making a direct comparison thing. I'm not excusing Clintons behavior mind you, but in the broader scope of impacting lives (and deaths) worldwide, Bush's actions seem to be on a much higher scale, if we're breaking it down to which president is "more" disgraceful".
I do understand where Galt is coming from, but I guess I'm thinking on a much broader criteria.