Oh look at the circle-jerk I've been missing!
Par for the course, you've turned the thread--once again--into nothing now but posting about me and you two geniuses have put your heads together (in more ways than one) and determined that... I am a racist.
My experience living in Mexico doesn't count because... like, you have the Internet.
And hey, why
not be the expert on Senor Frogs while admitting you've never been in one! Tiki bar vibe? lulz
Nativist? More lulz.
That's some real pre-school arguing there, that is. As I pointed out earlier, every thread ends the same way: with you two accusing me of being what I criticize. Absolutely the kind of low-information "logic" you can find on FOX & Friends every morning.
Well done!
NOW, getting back on topic before this thread is closed, to Professor's point:
Yeah, this is what happens when you pass knee-jerk laws to allow discrimination without thinking them through--you end up with unintended consequences because of the way the law was worded. Just like the apparently unintentional opening to discriminate against people who are having non-martial sex.
Remember that Florida law that was upheld allowing prayers to be held before some city council meeting? That one opened up a whole can of worms when satanists then demanded they get to have a prayer, along with Muslims.
There was also some sort of unintended consequences with the Hobby Lobby birth control issue but I can't remember what they were.