Orlando

[ToddStarnes]

[lnrw]

[ToddStarnes]

I provided a clear example of how limiting access to tools of destruction prevents terrorism. I can provide many, many others from across the pond where firearm laws are more restrictive.

Your argument seems to be "smart terrorists are always going to find a way, so we shouldn't restrict access to accessories of terrorism and just let the dumber terrorists go to town on people". Is this inaccurate? If so, how is it inaccurate?

[lnrw]

I made no such argument, that' how it's inaccurate.

Also, using anything as a weapon against a human being(s) in an act of terrorism is banned in just about every country in the world.

[ToddStarnes]

[lnrw]

[ToddStarnes]

Okay. So your argument is that we shouldn't even worry at all about limiting terrorists' access to firearms because they can just make bombs?

[lnrw]

[ToddStarnes]

So what is the point of saying that "they can make bombs, with or without guns"? This does nothing to address my position that we should make it more difficult for terrorists to obtain firearms.

[lnrw]